Ignition Interlock Devices - Pitfalls And Problems

as reliable, Blood Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devicesconsiderably flawed. The IID is rarely granted to
are anything but. An Ignition Interlock Device is aalcoholics, but often first time offenders who
cheap breathalyzer which is connected to thehave made a mistake.
electrical system of an offender's vehicle. BeforeThe interlock devices used in Massachusetts use
driving, the interlock user must breathe into thefuel cell technology. This is considerably less reliable
device so that it can gauge his or her BAC (bloodthan the infra-red technology used in police
alcohol content) reading. If the driver's BAC is .020breathalyzers. These devices are not alcohol
or below, the device allows the engine to start.specific and a variety of substances other than
However, if the driver's BAC is .021 or above, thealcoholic beverages will register as alcohol. For
car will not start. Once the car starts, the driverexample, Attorney Simoneau has personally
must periodically breathe into the device. If thehandled cases were common substances such as
device registers a BAC which is over a pre-setprotein bars, cough drops, cinnamon, baked goods,
limit, a "rolling re-test violation" will occur. Theseperfume, hairspray, and favored coffee has
rolling re-tests are designed to insure that theregistered as alcohol. Attorney Simoneau has also
driver is not drinking while driving and he or shehandled cases were the interlock device has
did not have someone else provide the initialregistered alcohol and the driver immediately went
breath sample.to a hospital or police station for a comparison
In Massachusetts, an Interlock Device is requiredblood alcohol test. In every instance, these tests
for anyone whose license has his or her licenseand/or police observations completely
twice suspended in Massachusetts or any othercontradicted the faulty ignition interlock device.
jurisdiction for Drunk Driving or certain otherThese are only a few examples of the many
alcohol related offenses. There has been agitatedproblems associated with interlock devices. Other
debate about ignition interlock devices inproblems include defective equipment, frayed
Massachusetts since their inception. These devicescords, and rejection of breath samples.
were required for drivers who reinstated theirThe ignition interlock device is not a reliable device,
suspended license or were on hardship licenses,and it relies on the "guilty until proven innocent"
effective January 1, 2006. Although some claimmindset. That is not what this country's legal
interlock is the answer to many DUI issues, manysystem is supposed to represent. No device that
experts point out that the device is faulty.can so easily mistake items like baked goods,
Attorney Brian Simoneau has documentedprotein bars, mouthwash, and cough drops for
numerous instances of false positive readings.alcohol should be relied upon to suspend
False alcohol readings have resulted in 10 year andsomeone's license for 10 years or life. The sensor
lifetime license suspensions. .tests BAC through an oxidation reaction to the
The ignition interlock device is not completelybreath, unlike the more reliable infrared
problematic. Like any debatable item, the devicespectroscopy used in evidentiary breathalyzers.
has its benefits. For instance, by preventing peopleTherefore, drivers are given a sub-par machine
with a high BAC from driving, the device maythat can potentially label them a criminal and
possibly keep the roads safer and less prone todestroy their lives. A person should be innocent
accidents during certain hours where heavyuntil proven guilty, but with an unreliable detector,
drinking is the norm. The Registry of Motorthe opposite is true.
Vehicles and Board of Appeal should feel moreHopefully you are now more educated on this
comfortable granting hardship licenses to individualsmatter. Before the laws evolve any more, the
with interlock devices. Interlock Devices shouldexisting laws need to be perfected. No one should
allow multiple offenders to keep their jobs soever be charged for a violation which they have
they can live their lives and support theirnot committed and until these devices are proven
families.In a perfect world, that may be enough,to be more accurate, they should not be blindly
but this world is not perfect, and the device isrelied upon to suspend someone's license.