EOTech vs. Aimpoint: A debate for the modern tactical shooter

While on a recent shopping trip for optics, I wasa set of batteries on a medium bright setting
tasked with picking from two of the best, yet(carry spares)
most debated optics on the market: EOTech vs.- No glass covers
Aimpoint.  I will let you form your own opinion,- Push buttons harder to operate under stress
and there is really no wrong selection with these– especially with glove on
battle proven workhorses.  I will, however,Aimpoint
suggest that you save some money for a goodPros
pair of back up iron sights (BUIS). You never- Long battery life - 10,000 hrs on one battery
know what might happen.- Simple operation...single roll on/off control
Optics Classifieds- Comes with lens covers
EOTech- Anti-glare lens filter/covers available
Pros- Rugged
- 65 MOA circle w/ 1 MOA dot – Better for- Battle test and proven
target acquisition- Choice of 2 or 4 MOA dot
- Multiple values of brightness adjustmentsCons
- Various models with different batteries, including- More expensive of the 2.
easy to find AA batteries.- No mount included – aftermarket mounts
- Built in mount, commercial QD mounts availableare expensive
(equals less expense)- 30mm tube very slightly slower than Eotech
- Large window allows for faster target acquisitionwindow
- Less expensive than a comparable Aimpoint- Dot initially harder to locate in bright sunlight
- RuggedThe debate continues, and there may never be a
- Battle test and provenclear cut winner. I, for one, am glad to have two
- Mounts low on the rifle for a snug, sturdy, nogreat options available, not include other popular
snag mountbrands that can be feathered into this debate
Conssuch as the ACOG.  Maybe we can discuss that
- Short battery life. Typically 150 hrs or less withone another time and place.